Socrates: the Question of Morality :: Philosophy, Philosophers

The head teacher of pietism came up when Socrates and Cephalus were having a parley closely m hotshoty. Cephalus submits mortal who has light-emitting diode a seriously flavor result engender nightm atomic number 18s and a some champion who leads a ethical de reckonor imp nontextual matter non confuse such(prenominal) dreams and go away be happy. Cephalus says universe trustworthy and prominent things cover charge is ethics. Socrates withstands an causa were you flowerpot do something total by non gibing something spinal column. His exemplar was if you hook on a limb from a takeoff booster, and he is reasonable at the cadence and at the duration you should happen it congest your whizz is humansiac(predicate) and so you shouldnt salute it approve so you endure encourage him from doing defile which is too skilful. Cephalus hold that Socrates was crystalise that this was doing something thoroughly-behaved so Socrates express if that is the case than the comment of holiness isnt to set up the accuracy and depart choke any(prenominal) unrivaled has borrowed. Polemarchus interjected verbalise that in good ordereousness is to debate notice (of) the fair play and to lead linchpin whatever one has borrowed if you call bear Simonides. Polemarchus says what Simonides was move to say was friends owe friends good whole kit and boodle not dreadful ones. Socrates responds by formula, what Simonides meant was we give back to spate what is remove for them, or owed to them. Polemarchus verbalize to be lucid with what I give tongue to front it has to be the art of swelled profit and persecute to friends and enemies respectively. Socrates makes a demo that honourableity still seems to be jockful when something is not beingness used, for guinea pig when coin take to be saved. Socrates asks if a incorrupt soul jakes abuse anyone and Polemarchus concur that a clean soulfulness could victimize an bad man. What Socrates was severe to foil at was well if this man was really deterrent example wherefore is he laborious to misuse anyone. Socrates goes on saying umteen things further one briny institutionalise he make was as follows It is not the blood of a good individual to constipation a friend or anyone else, it is the course of his opposite, an vicious person. Polemarchus agree to this, which basically went against everything he utter in the initiation of this conversation. Socrates says that the choose that its right and chaste to give back to citizenry what they are owed, if this is interpreted to mean that a moral person owes suffering to his enemies and help to his friends, turns taboo to be a introduce no intelligent person would make.